Inside Arlington

Experimental News Digest for Arlington, MA

Town Meeting discusses Gaza Ceasefire, May 08, 2024

Article 5: Ceasefire Resolution

Ceasefire Resolution Discussion in Arlington Town Meeting

On the evening of May 8, 2024, during the annual town meeting, the town of Arlington, Massachusetts, deliberated on Article 5, a resolution calling for a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war brought forth by Arlington residents. The resolution made its way through various stages within the town government, starting from the Arlington Human Rights Commission (AHRC), then to the Select Board, and ultimately landing on the town meeting for a decision.

The Resolution and Its Path

The resolution aimed to express solidarity with Arlington residents deeply affected by the global conflict and to call for a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and an end to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Proponents argued for the resolution as a symbolic gesture representing Arlington’s values of peace, human rights, and human dignity.

The AHRC endorsed the ceasefire resolution, a rare move considering its previous hesitance and recommendation for town meeting as a more appropriate venue for such matters. Advocates stressed the impact silence had on the affected community members, and the resolution was seen as a step toward acknowledgment and healing.

Opposition and Substitute Motion of No Action

Opponents of the resolution, including those proposing a substitute motion of No Action, viewed the matter as outside the jurisdiction of the town meeting, better suited for more comprehensive, protected discussions. They believed that a local government should avoid stances on complex international matters that are not directly connected to local governance. Additionally, concerns were raised about further polarizing an already divided community.

The decision to consider a substitute motion of No Action deviated from the traditional practice by past moderators, marking the current meeting with a distinctive approach. The substitute motion proposed abstaining from the vote altogether was grounded in principles that town meeting should not engage in foreign policy deliberations and should instead concentrate on local issues.

Outcome and Implications

Following discussions and presentations from both sides, a majority of the town meeting members voted in favor of the substitute motion of No Action, determining that the Arlington town meeting would not express a formal opinion on the resolution. The final vote emphasized the town’s preference to direct its focus on matters within its purview and jurisdiction, aiming to prevent exacerbating community divisions.

Despite the resolution not being adopted, the process of its consideration sparked civic engagement and dialogue within the town. It underscored the community’s varying perspectives on the role of local government in international issues and highlighted the importance of respecting differing viewpoints within a democratic process.



Inside Arlington was created by two Arlingtonians who are deeply concerned by the decline in local news and its impact on civic life. Our mission is to provide accessible information to Arlington residents to foster an informed and engaged citizenry. And we want to do it in an economically sustainable way. More…


Receive Inside Arlington by email: